Which one is better, monovision contact lenses or mutifocal contact lenses?

Answers (3)

• walkingalone089

  08/30/2012

  monovision contact lenses are made to help people correct vision for both near and far. A pair of Monovision contact lenses is made of two different lenses- one lenses to correct only for distance vision in one eye while the other for only near vision in other eye. Different from monovision contact lenses, mutifocal contact lenses can provide vision correction at all distances in both eyes. So, i think mutifocal contact lenses are better than monovision contacts.

  Helpful(0 ) Report Abuse

• David Felker

  09/03/2012

  Sometimes, you will be recommended to wear mutifocal contact lenses instead of monovision contact lenses. There is no doubt that the mutifocal contact lenses are a better choice. Monovision contact lenses are mainly applied to 40-45 presbyopia elderly. Although to some extent, they can satisfy your reading needs. However, they have some limitations that maybe cause some symptoms, such as nausea, headache, dizziness, general malaise and so on. Moreover, in special circumstances, such as driving at night must be considered. Fortunately, for the disadvantages above, they can be avoided by mutifocal contact lenses. Unlike monovision contact lenses which only have two different lens. Rather, mutifocal contact lenses can meet the eyes of all distances reading. Therefore, the choice of the latter is better.

  Helpful(0 ) Report Abuse

• Sheldon Sierra

  01/14/2021

  Hey there, Whenever I ask people what their biggest problem is setting up new sites, they always say one thing: Content. You need the content to get the rankings to get the traffic (and to make sure Google doesn't decide you're 'thin'...) This is why we use spinners. Google eats content at such a rate it's pretty much impossible to keep up manually. So -- luckily! -- there's a number of software tools out there, called article spinners. When people ask me which one's best, I always say Spin Rewriter. I don't even think about it. It's like being asked if you'd rather go on a date with Donald Trump or Gal Gadot - there's just no contest. Spin Rewriter produces better results, it's really well supported, and it makes producing content really fast. There's a video here showing it producing 500 human-readable articles in about 45 seconds: https://www.alecpow.com/spin-rewriter-official There's only one downside to Spin Rewriter. It's rather expensive. $197/year, normally. Quite honestly, given how much time it can save you producing articles, that's still worth the investment. But not everyone just has that lying around. Fortunately, you don't need that much. Tomorrow, Spin Rewriter 11 is launching. The spinning algorithm's been made even better, and there's a host of new features. And the price of the annual licence is being slashed. And not only will you lock in that lower price... You'll get a 5-day trial completely for free. You don't need to give up anything more than an e-mail address. That's happening at [TIME] tomorrow. Keep watching the skies.

  Helpful(0 ) Report Abuse